bleodswean: (Default)
bleodswean ([personal profile] bleodswean) wrote in [community profile] the_scent_of_lilacs 2025-03-30 09:15 pm (UTC)

Ooooh, what is this 1931 film?

It's discouraging that Lucy is so misrepresented in the '92 portrayal. I will have to spend some time scouring through other versions.

I agree with you now that I've read Stoker! He's so forward thinking and definitely able to imagine worlds unknown to him and his times. I mean this guy essentially penned a love letter to Whitman! What's that all about?! And yes, his wife! I think if he wanted Lucy sexed up for any reason - lust to misogyny - he was entirely capable. Lucy is innocence defiled.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting